While C compilers will generally process strings across lines, we really
don't want that. I rather treat this as the indication of the typo it
probably is warn about it than support this odd C edge case.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The token value can be NULL if we run into something that failed to
parse. Throw a Python exception rather than SEGV.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Before it was setting SDIR, which is /usr/lib/frr, but the vtysh binary is put
under bindir (which is /usr/local by default). And running `/usr/lib/frr/frr reload`
failed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
It's not 4 bytes, it was assuming the same as Graceful-Restart tuples.
LLGR has more 3 bytes (Long-lived Stale Time).
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
All the event changes exposed a bunch of places where
we were not properly following our standards. Just
clean them up in one big fell swoop.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Problem:
Multiple memory leaks after pr12366
RCA:
ospf_lsa_unlock was not happening for the few of the LSAs in
ospf_lsa_refresh_walker after pr12366 due to which memory
related to lsas was leaking.
Fix:
Moved the ospf_lsa_unlock outside if check.
Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
We have this valgrind trace:
==1125== Invalid read of size 4
==1125== at 0x170A7D: pim_if_delete (pim_iface.c:203)
==1125== by 0x170C01: pim_if_terminate (pim_iface.c:80)
==1125== by 0x174F34: pim_instance_terminate (pim_instance.c:68)
==1125== by 0x17535B: pim_vrf_terminate (pim_instance.c:260)
==1125== by 0x1941CF: pim_terminate (pimd.c:161)
==1125== by 0x1B476D: pim_sigint (pim_signals.c:44)
==1125== by 0x4910C22: frr_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:133)
==1125== by 0x49220A4: thread_fetch (thread.c:1777)
==1125== by 0x48DC8E2: frr_run (libfrr.c:1222)
==1125== by 0x15E12A: main (pim_main.c:176)
==1125== Address 0x6274d28 is 1,192 bytes inside a block of size 1,752 free'd
==1125== at 0x48369AB: free (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1125== by 0x174FF1: pim_vrf_delete (pim_instance.c:181)
==1125== by 0x4925480: vrf_delete (vrf.c:264)
==1125== by 0x4925480: vrf_delete (vrf.c:238)
==1125== by 0x49332C7: zclient_vrf_delete (zclient.c:2187)
==1125== by 0x4934319: zclient_read (zclient.c:4003)
==1125== by 0x492249C: thread_call (thread.c:2008)
==1125== by 0x48DC8D7: frr_run (libfrr.c:1223)
==1125== by 0x15E12A: main (pim_main.c:176)
==1125== Block was alloc'd at
==1125== at 0x4837B65: calloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1125== by 0x48E80AF: qcalloc (memory.c:116)
==1125== by 0x1750DA: pim_instance_init (pim_instance.c:90)
==1125== by 0x1750DA: pim_vrf_new (pim_instance.c:161)
==1125== by 0x4924FDC: vrf_get (vrf.c:183)
==1125== by 0x493334C: zclient_vrf_add (zclient.c:2157)
==1125== by 0x4934319: zclient_read (zclient.c:4003)
==1125== by 0x492249C: thread_call (thread.c:2008)
==1125== by 0x48DC8D7: frr_run (libfrr.c:1223)
==1125== by 0x15E12A: main (pim_main.c:176)
and you do this series of events:
a) Create a vrf, put an interface in it
b) Turn on pim on that interface and turn on pim in that vrf
c) Delete the vrf
d) Do anything with the interface, in this case shutdown the system
The move of the interface to a new vrf is leaving the pim_ifp->pim pointer pointing
at the old pim instance, which was just deleted, so the instance pointer was freed.
Let's clean up the pim pointer in the interface pointer as well.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The flag for telling BGP that a route is expected to be installed
first before notifying a peer was always being set upon receipt
of a path that could be accepted as bestpath. This is not correct:
imagine that you have a peer sending you a route and you have a
network statement that covers the same route. Irrelevant if the
network statement would win the flag on the dest was being set
in bgp_update. Thus you could get into a situation where
the network statement path wins but since the flag is set on
the node, it will never be announced to a peer.
Let's just move the setting of the flag into bgp_zebra_announce
and _withdraw. In _announce set the flag to TRUE when suppress-fib
is enabled. In _withdraw just always unset the flag as that a withdrawal
does not need to wait for rib removal before announcing. This will
cover the case when a network statement is added after the route has
been learned from a peer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
If configuring `neighbor password` under VRF (not default), the session
will never be established.
Before setting TCP_MD5 for the connection fd, we need to enable this on the
accept direction as well (listener).
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
