forked from Mirror/frr
mgmtd: rpc and action handling both should use rpc map.
The previous idea of using config xpath registrations for actions b/c the config is the subject of the action is sub-optimal. It splits handling of YANG "actions" (Action and RPCs) between 2 different registartion maps for the same category of functionality. Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c54bc7a8dd
commit
a727cc7d76
|
@ -1443,20 +1443,14 @@ static void fe_adapter_handle_rpc(struct mgmt_fe_session_ctx *session,
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (snode->nodetype == LYS_RPC)
|
||||
clients =
|
||||
mgmt_be_interested_clients(xpath,
|
||||
MGMT_BE_XPATH_SUBSCR_TYPE_RPC);
|
||||
else if (snode->nodetype == LYS_ACTION)
|
||||
clients =
|
||||
mgmt_be_interested_clients(xpath,
|
||||
MGMT_BE_XPATH_SUBSCR_TYPE_CFG);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if (snode->nodetype != LYS_RPC && snode->nodetype != LYS_ACTION) {
|
||||
fe_adapter_send_error(session, req_id, false, -EINVAL,
|
||||
"Not an RPC or action path: %s", xpath);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
clients = mgmt_be_interested_clients(xpath,
|
||||
MGMT_BE_XPATH_SUBSCR_TYPE_RPC);
|
||||
if (!clients) {
|
||||
__dbg("No backends implement xpath: %s for txn-id: %" PRIu64
|
||||
" session-id: %" PRIu64,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue