With the recent suppoort of multiple sources of RPs, we can assume non static RPs
are BSR RPs. Just make the check explicit for BSR.
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
On the BSR node itself, RPs shouldn't timeout, becase we know
the node is the BSR, and it is active!
fixes:#17587
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Refactor the next hop tracking in PIM to fully support the configured RPF lookup mode.
Moved many NHT related functions to pim_nht.h/c
NHT now tracks both MRIB and URIB tables and makes nexthop decisions based on the configured lookup mode.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Fix Coverity Scan CID 1602463: make it impossible for the function to fail.
Hardcode the multicast prefix generation instead of calling `str2prefix()`
which caused unnecessary memory allocations and returned error values.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
For BSMs, we should track which of the RP candidates in the BSM message
are actually available, before trying to use them (which also puts them
in NHT for that). This applies for both BSRs as well as BSM receivers.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Topology Used:
=============
Cisco---FRR4----FRR2
Initially PIM nbr is down between FRR4----FRR2 from FRR2 side
Cisco is sending BSR packet to FRR4.
Problem Statement:
=================
No shutdown the PIM neighbor on FRR2 towards FRR4.
FRR2, receives BSR packet immediately as the new neighbor
comes up. This BSR packet is having no-forward bit set.
FRR2 is not able to process the BSR packet, and drop the
BSR packet.
Root Cause:
==========
When PIMD comes up, we start BSM timer for 60 seconds.
Here, the value accept_nofwd_bsm is setting to false.
FRR2, when receives no-forward BSR packet, it is getting
accept_nofwd_bsm value as false.
So, it drops, the no-forward BSM packet.
Fix:
===
Set accept_nofwd_bsm as false after first BSM packet received.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
These are in packed structs at weird offsets (e.g. 2 bytes), and as such
need a memcpy to get them into proper alignment.
It'd be even better if the pimd code used proper de/serialization, but
let's get this improved one step at a time.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
For pim callbacks, we pass pim_addr as value, not pointer.
So making it consistent for pim_nht callbacks.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Added this api to fill all multicast group address based on IP version.
For PIMv4 its 224.0.0.0/4, for PIMv6 its FF00::0/8.
Changed the code where its being used currently.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
We can use PIMADDR_ANY instead of INADDR_NONE to initalize rp->rpf_addr
when there is no rp configured for group_all.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Since `pim_sgaddr` is `pim_addr` now, that causes a whole lot of fallout
anywhere S,G pairs are handled.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
